Death drive

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Lacanian Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
French: pulsion de mort
German: Todestrieb

Sigmund Freud[edit | edit source]

Freud introduced the concept of the death drive in Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920).

Here he established a fundamental opposition between life drives (eros), conceived of as a tendency towards cohesion and unity, and the death drives, which operate in the opposite direction, undoing connections and destroying things.

The concept of the death drive was one of the most controversial concepts introduced by Freud, and many of his disciples rejected it, but Freud continued to reaffirm the concept for the rest of his life.

Jacques Lacan[edit | edit source]

Psychoanalysis[edit | edit source]

Lacan follows Freud in reaffirming the concept of the death drive as central to psychoanalysis:

"To ignore the death instinct in his [Freud's] doctrine is to misunderstand that doctrine entirely."<ref>Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 301</ref>

Nostalgia[edit | edit source]

In Lacan's first remarks on the death drive, in 1938, he describes it as a nostalgia for a lost harmony, a desire to return to the preoedipal fusion with the mother's breast, the loss of which is marked on the psyche in the weaning complex.<ref>Lacan, Jacques. Les complexes familiaux dans la formation de l'individu. Essai d'analyse d'une fonction en psychologie, Paris: Navarin, 1984 [1938]. p. 35</ref>

Narcissism[edit | edit source]

In 1946 he links the death drive to the suicidal tendency of narcissism.<ref>Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p. 186</ref>.

By linking the death drive with the preoedipal phase and with narcissism, these early remarks would place the death drive in what Lacan later comes to call the imaginary order.

Symbolic Order[edit | edit source]

However, when Lacan begins to develop his concept of the three orders of imaginary, symbolic and real, in the 1950s, he does not situate the death drive in the imaginary but in the symbolic.

Repetition[edit | edit source]

In the seminar of 1954-5, for example, he argues that the death drive is simply the fundamental tendency of the symbolic order to produce repetition:

"The death instinct is only the mask of the symbolic order."<ref>Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book II. The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954-55. Trans. Sylvana Tomaselli. New York: Nortion; Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press, 1988. p. 326</ref>

Biological Instincts[edit | edit source]

This shift also marks a difference with Freud, for whom the death drive was closely bound up with biology, representing the fundamental tendency of every living thing to return to an inorganic state.

By situating the death drive firmly in the symbolic, Lacan articulates it with culture rather than nature; he states that the death drive "is not a question of biology,"<ref>Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p. 102</ref>, and must be distinguished from the biological instinct to return to the inanimate.<ref>Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book VII. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-60. Trans. Dennis Porter. London: Routledge, 1992. p. 211-12</ref>

Sexual Drives[edit | edit source]

Another difference between Lacan's concept of the death drive and Freud's emerges in 1964.

Freud opposed the death drive to the sexual drives, but now Lacan argues that the death drive is not a separate drive, but is in fact an aspect of every drive.

"The distinction between the life drive and the death drive is - true in as much as it manifests two aspects of the drive."<ref>Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book XI. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, 1964. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1977. p. 257</ref>

Hence Lacan writes that "every drive is virtually a death drive" because:

  1. every drive pursues its own extinction,
  2. every drive involves the subject in repetition, and
  3. every drive is an attempt to go beyond the pleasure principle, to the realm of excess jouissance where enjoyment is experienced as suffering.<ref>Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p. 844</ref>

See Also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]